|Introduced in House||Passed House||Introduced in Senate||Passed Senate||Became Law|
Transportation funding; statewide prioritization process.
Requires the Commonwealth Transportation Board, when administering SMART SCALE, to ensure that projects are evaluated for district grant program funds and high-priority funds separately, and that the projects selected in one program do not impact the other program. The bill requires the Board to weight congestion mitigation at at least 55 percent in the Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads highway construction districts. The bill requires that projects eligible for district grant program funds receive a district-specific score and an overall score.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
� 33.2-214.1. Statewide prioritization process for project selection.
A. The General Assembly declares it to be in the public interest that a prioritization process for projects funded by the Commonwealth Transportation Board be developed and implemented to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the states transportation system, transportation safety, transportation accessibility for people and freight, environmental quality, and economic development in the Commonwealth.
B. Subject to the limitations in subsection C, the Commonwealth Transportation Board shall develop, in accordance with federal transportation requirements, and in cooperation with metropolitan planning organizations wholly within the Commonwealth and with the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, a statewide prioritization process for the use of all funds allocated pursuant to �� 33.2-358, 33.2-370, and 33.2-371 or apportioned pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 104. Such prioritization process shall be used for the development of the Six-Year Improvement Program pursuant to � 33.2-214 and shall consider, at a minimum, highway, transit, rail, roadway, technology operational improvements, and transportation demand management strategies.
1. The prioritization process shall be based on an objective and quantifiable analysis that considers, at a minimum, the following factors relative to the cost of the project or strategy: congestion mitigation, economic development, accessibility, safety, and environmental quality. All project or strategy benefits shall be considered relative to the cost of such project during all phases of the prioritization process.
2. Prior to the analysis in subdivision 1, candidate projects and strategies shall be screened by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to determine whether they are consistent with the assessment of capacity needs for all for corridors of statewide significance, regional networks, and improvements to promote urban development areas established pursuant to � 15.2-2223.1, undertaken in the Statewide Transportation Plan in accordance with � 33.2-353.
3. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall weight the factors used in subdivision 1 for each of the states highway construction districts. The Commonwealth Transportation Board may assign different weights to the factors, within each highway construction district, based on the unique needs and qualities of each highway construction district. In the Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads highway construction districts, the Commonwealth Transportation Board shall ensure that congestion mitigation is weighted at at least 55 percent.
4. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall solicit input from localities, metropolitan planning organizations, transit authorities, transportation authorities, and other stakeholders in its development of the prioritization process pursuant to this section. Further, the Board shall explicitly consider input provided by an applicable metropolitan planning organization or the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority when developing the weighting of factors pursuant to subdivision 3 for a metropolitan planning area with a population over 200,000 individuals.
5. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall ensure that the selection of projects or strategies for funding pursuant to (i) the district grant program pursuant to � 33.2-371 and (ii) the high-priority projects program pursuant to � 33.2-370 remain completely separate and that the projects selected through one program do not impact the selection of projects in the other. However, the provisions of this subsection shall not prevent the Board from ensuring that the same project is not granted funds under both programs.
C. The prioritization process developed under subsection B shall not apply to the following: projects or activities undertaken pursuant to � 33.2-352; projects funded by the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funds apportioned to the state pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 104(b)(4) and state matching funds; projects funded by the Highway Safety Improvement Program funds apportioned to the state pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 104(b)(3) and state matching funds; projects funded by the Transportation Alternatives funds set-aside pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 213 and state matching funds; projects funded by the revenue-sharing program pursuant to � 33.2-357; and projects funded by federal programs established by the federal government after June 30, 2014, with specific rules that restrict the types of projects that may be funded, excluding restrictions on the location of projects with regard to highway functional classification. The Commonwealth Transportation Board may, at its discretion, develop a prioritization process for any of the funds covered by this subsection, subject to planning and funding requirements of federal law.
� 33.2-370. High-priority projects program.
A. As used in this section, "high-priority projects" means those projects of regional or statewide significance, such as projects that reduce congestion or increase safety, accessibility, environmental quality, or economic development.
B. The Board shall establish a high-priority projects program and shall use funds allocated in � 33.2-358 to the program for projects and strategies that address a transportation need identified for a corridor of statewide significance or a regional network in the Statewide Transportation Plan pursuant to � 33.2-353. From funds allocated to this program, the Board shall allocate funds to the Innovation and Technology Transportation Fund, provided that the allocation shall not exceed $25 million annually.
C. In selecting projects and strategies for funding under this program, the Board shall screen, evaluate, and select candidate projects and strategies according to the process established pursuant to subsection B of � 33.2-214.1 and compare them to all other projects eligible for funding pursuant to this section.
� 33.2-371. Highway construction district grant programs.
A. As used in this section:
"Land area" means the total land area of the counties within a highway construction district reduced by the area of any military reservations and state or national parks or forests within its boundaries and such other similar areas and facilities of five square miles in area or more, as may be determined by the Board.
"Population" means the population according to the latest U.S. census or the latest population estimates made by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service of the University of Virginia, whichever is more recent.
B. The Board shall establish a grant program in each highway construction district to fund projects and strategies that address a need in the Statewide Transportation Plan developed pursuant to � 33.2-353.
C. The Board shall solicit candidate projects and strategies from local governments for consideration in the applicable highway construction districts grant program. Candidate projects and strategies shall be screened, evaluated, and selected by the Board according to the process established pursuant to subsection B of � 33.2-214.1 but shall be within a highway construction district and not outside such highway construction district. Candidate projects and strategies from localities within a highway construction district shall be scored against projects and strategies within the same highway construction district and shall receive a district-specific score as well as an overall score. Only those candidate projects and strategies submitted by a locality shall be funded.
D. Funds allocated to this program under � 33.2-358 shall be distributed to each highway construction district for that districts grant program as follows:
1. Thirty percent based on the ratio of the population of the cities and towns eligible to receive payments pursuant to � 33.2-319 within a highway construction district to the total population of the cities and towns eligible to receive payments pursuant to � 33.2-319 within the Commonwealth;
2. Twenty-eight percent based on the ratio of vehicle miles traveled on primary highways within the highway construction district to the total vehicle miles traveled on primary highways in the Commonwealth;
3. Twenty-four percent based on the ratio of the population of counties within a highway construction district to the total population of all counties within the Commonwealth;
4. Ten percent based on the ratio of the number of primary lane-miles in the highway construction district to the total number of primary lane-miles within the Commonwealth;
5. Six percent based on the ratio of the land area of counties within the highway construction district to the total land area of counties within the Commonwealth; and
6. Two percent based on a primary need factor based on addressing the largest under-allocation to highway construction districts relative to primary needs.
E. Projects awarded funds under a grant program established by this section may be administered by the local government pursuant to � 33.2-228 or by the Department.
|01/30/2020||House||House: Subcommittee recommends laying on the table (8-Y 2-N)|
|01/14/2020||House||House: Assigned Transportation sub: Transportation Systems|
|01/06/2020||House||House: Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20104059D|
|01/06/2020||House||House: Referred to Committee on Transportation|