|Introduced in House||Passed House||Introduced in Senate||Passed Senate||Became Law|
Statewide prioritization process; project selection.
Requires the Commonwealth Transportation Board, when evaluating projects under the statewide prioritization process known as SMART SCALE, to evaluate (i) congestion mitigation on the basis of total traffic volumes, not just traffic volumes during weekdays, and (ii) accessibility on the basis of the area of influence of a project for a radius of 55 miles.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That � 33.2-214.1 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
� 33.2-214.1. Statewide prioritization process for project selection.
A. The General Assembly declares it to be in the public interest that a prioritization process for projects funded by the Commonwealth Transportation Board be developed and implemented to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the states transportation system, transportation safety, transportation accessibility for people and freight, environmental quality, and economic development in the Commonwealth.
B. Subject to the limitations in subsection C, the Commonwealth Transportation Board shall develop, in accordance with federal transportation requirements, and in cooperation with metropolitan planning organizations wholly within the Commonwealth and with the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority, a statewide prioritization process for the use of funds allocated pursuant to �� 33.2-358, 33.2-370, and 33.2-371 or apportioned pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 104. Such prioritization process shall be used for the development of the Six-Year Improvement Program pursuant to � 33.2-214 and shall consider, at a minimum, highway, transit, rail, roadway, technology operational improvements, and transportation demand management strategies.
1. The prioritization process shall be based on an objective and quantifiable analysis that considers, at a minimum, the following factors relative to the cost of the project or strategy: congestion mitigation, economic development, accessibility, safety, and environmental quality. In evaluating congestion mitigation, the Board shall assess person throughput and person hours of delay on the basis of the number of users during all times of the week and not only for weekday times. In evaluating accessibility, the Board shall assess the area of influence of a project for a radius of 55 miles.
2. Prior to the analysis in subdivision 1, candidate projects and strategies shall be screened by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to determine whether they are consistent with the assessment of capacity needs for all for corridors of statewide significance, regional networks, and improvements to promote urban development areas established pursuant to � 15.2-2223.1, undertaken in the Statewide Transportation Plan in accordance with � 33.2-353.
3. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall weight the factors used in subdivision 1 for each of the states highway construction districts. The Commonwealth Transportation Board may assign different weights to the factors, within each highway construction district, based on the unique needs and qualities of each highway construction district.
4. The Commonwealth Transportation Board shall solicit input from localities, metropolitan planning organizations, transit authorities, transportation authorities, and other stakeholders in its development of the prioritization process pursuant to this section. Further, the Board shall explicitly consider input provided by an applicable metropolitan planning organization or the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority when developing the weighting of factors pursuant to subdivision 3 for a metropolitan planning area with a population over 200,000 individuals.
C. The prioritization process developed under subsection B shall not apply to the following: projects or activities undertaken pursuant to � 33.2-352; projects funded by the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funds apportioned to the state pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 104(b)(4) and state matching funds; projects funded by the Highway Safety Improvement Program funds apportioned to the state pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 104(b)(3) and state matching funds; projects funded by the Transportation Alternatives funds set-aside pursuant to 23 U.S.C. � 213 and state matching funds; projects funded by the revenue-sharing program pursuant to � 33.2-357; and projects funded by federal programs established by the federal government after June 30, 2014, with specific rules that restrict the types of projects that may be funded, excluding restrictions on the location of projects with regard to highway functional classification. The Commonwealth Transportation Board may, at its discretion, develop a prioritization process for any of the funds covered by this subsection, subject to planning and funding requirements of federal law.
|01/14/2020||House||House: Assigned Transportation sub: Transportation Systems|
|01/06/2020||House||House: Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20103914D|
|01/06/2020||House||House: Referred to Committee on Transportation|